![]()
![]()
for
7.2 Taylor Series Representations
In Section 4.4 we showed that functions defined by power series have derivatives of all orders (Theorem 4.16). In Section 6.5 we demonstrated that analytic functions also have derivatives of all orders (Corollary 6.2). It seems natural, therefore, that there would be some connection between analytic functions and power series. As you might guess, the connection exists via the Taylor and Maclaurin series of analytic functions.
Definition 7.2 (Taylor
Series). If
is
analytic at
,
then the series
![[Graphics:Images/TaylorSeriesMod_gr_3.gif]](taylorseries/TaylorSeriesMod/Images/TaylorSeriesMod_gr_3.gif)
is called the Taylor series for f(z)
centered at
. When
the center is
,
the series is called the Maclaurin series for f(z).
To investigate when these series converge we will need the following lemma.
Lemma
7.1. If
are
complex numbers with
, and
, then
where n is a positive integer.
Proof of Lemma 7.1 is in the book.
Complex
Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering
We are now ready for the main result of this section.
Theorem 7.4 (Taylor's
Theorem).
Suppose f(z) is analytic in a domain
G, and that
is any disk contained in G. Then
the Taylor series for f(z) converges
to f(z) for all z in
; that
is,
for
all
.
Furthermore, for any r, 0<r<R, the convergence is uniform on
the closed subdisk
.
Proof of Theorem 7.4 is in the book.
Complex
Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering
A singular point of a function is a point
at which the function fails to be analytic. You will see
in Section 7.4 that
singular points of a function can be classified according to how
badly the function behaves at those points. Loosely
speaking, a nonremovable singular point of a function has the
property that it is impossible to redefine the value of the function
at that point so as to make it analytic there. For
example, the function
has a nonremovable singularity at z=1. We give a formal
definition of this concept in Section
7.4, but with this language we can nuance Taylor's theorem a
bit.
Corollary
7.3. Suppose that f(z) is
analytic in the domain G that
contains the point
. Let
be
a nonremovable singular point of minimum distance to the
point
. If
, then
(i) the
Taylor series
converges
to
on all of
,
and
(ii) if
, the
series
does
not converges to
.
Proof of Corollary 7.3 is in the
book.
Complex
Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering
Example 7.3. Show
that
is
valid for all
.
Solution. In Example 4.24 (see Section
4.4) we established this identity with the use of Theorem
4.17. We now do so via Theorem
7.4. If
, then
a standard induction argument (which we leave as an exercise) will
show that
for
. Thus
, and
Taylor's theorem gives
,
and since f(z) is analytic in
,
this series expansion is valid for all
.
![[Graphics:Images/TaylorSeriesMod.0_gr_2.gif]](taylorseries/TaylorSeriesMod/Images/TaylorSeriesMod.0_gr_2.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/TaylorSeriesMod.0_gr_4.gif]](taylorseries/TaylorSeriesMod/Images/TaylorSeriesMod.0_gr_4.gif)
The
disk
and
it's images under the mappings:
,
, and
.
Remark.
The accuracy of the image points for the
approximation
is
.
Example 7.4. Show
that, for
,
(7-12) (a)
and (b)
.
Solution. For
,
(7-13)
.
If we let
take the role of z in (7-13), we get
that
,
for
. But
iff
, thus
we have proven that
for
.
Next, let
take
the role of z in Equation (7-13), we get
that
![]()
gives the second part of Equations
(7-12).
![[Graphics:Images/TaylorSeriesMod.0_gr_12.gif]](taylorseries/TaylorSeriesMod/Images/TaylorSeriesMod.0_gr_12.gif)
![[Graphics:Images/TaylorSeriesMod.0_gr_14.gif]](taylorseries/TaylorSeriesMod/Images/TaylorSeriesMod.0_gr_14.gif)
The
disk
and
it's images under the mappings:
,
, and
.
Remark
1. The accuracy of the image points for the
approximation
is
.
Remark
2. The images of
under
the mappings:
,
, and
will
appear like those shown above,
because
rotates
the plane about the origin and
.
Also,
the accuracy of the image points for the
approximation
will
be
.
Explore Real Solution 7.4 (a).
Explore Complex Solution 7.4 (a).
Explore Real Solution 7.4 (b).
Explore Complex Solution 7.4 (b).
Remark
7.1 Corollary 7.3 clears up what often seems to
be a mystery when series are first introduced in
calculus. The calculus analog of Equations
(7-12) is
(7-14)
and
for
.
For many students, it makes sense that the first series in Equations
(7-14) converges only on the
interval
because
is undefined at the points
. It
seems unclear as to why this should also be the case for the series
representing
,
since the real-valued function
is defined everywhere. The explanation, of course, comes
from the complex domain. The complex function
is not defined everywhere. In fact, the singularities
of
are
at the points
, and
the distance between them and the point
equals
1. According to Corollary 7.3,
therefore, Equations (7-14) are valid
only for
,
and thus Equations (7-14) are valid only
for the real numbers
.
Alas, there is a potential fly in this
ointment: Corollary 7.3 applies to Taylor series. To form
the Taylor series of a function, we must compute its
derivatives. We didn't get the series in Equations
(7-12) by computing derivatives, so how
do we know that they are indeed the Taylor series centered
at
? Perhaps
the Taylor series would give completely different expressions from
those given by Equations
(7-12). Fortunately, Theorem
7.5 removes this possibility.
Theorem 7.5 (Uniqueness of
Power Series). Suppose that in some disk
we have
.
Then
.
Example 7.5. Find
the Maclaurin series for
.
Solution. Computing derivatives for f(z)
would be an onerous task. Fortunately, we can make use of the
trigonometric identity
.
Recall that the series for sin z (valid for all z)
is
. Using
the identity for
, we
obtain
![[Graphics:Images/TaylorSeriesMod_gr_193.gif]](taylorseries/TaylorSeriesMod/Images/TaylorSeriesMod_gr_193.gif)
By the uniqueness of power series, this last expression is the
Maclaurin series for
.
In the preceding argument we used some obvious results of power series representations that we haven't yet formally stated. The requisite results are part of Theorem 7.6.
Theorem 7.6. Let
f(z) and g(z)
have the power series representations
,
and
.
If
is
any complex constant, then
(7-15)
,
(7-16)
, and
(7-17)
, where
(7-18)
.
Identity (7-17) is known as the
Cauchy
product of the series for f(z) and
g(z).
Proof of Theorem 7.6 is in the book.
Complex
Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering
Example 7.6. Use
the Cauchy product of series to show that
for
.
Solution. We let
, for
. In
terms of Theorem 7.6, we have
, for
all n, and thus Equation (7-17)
gives
![[Graphics:Images/TaylorSeriesMod_gr_237.gif]](taylorseries/TaylorSeriesMod/Images/TaylorSeriesMod_gr_237.gif)
Extra Example
1. Use the Cauchy product of series to show
that
for
.
Explore Solution for Extra Example 1.
Extra Example
2. Show that
for
.
Solution. Use the result of Example 7.6 and
(7-16) and obtain
Explore Solution for Extra Example 2.
Exercises for Section 7.2. Taylor Series Representations
The Next Module is
Laurent
Series Representations
Return to the Complex Analysis Modules
Return to the Complex Analysis Project
This material is coordinated with our book Complex Analysis for Mathematics and Engineering.
(c) 2012 John H. Mathews, Russell W. Howell